An organization that uses taxpayer dollars to advance Democratic interests and sideline MAGA-aligned Republicans just survived a defunding effort thanks in large part to 81 Republican votes.
According to Western Journal, those 81 GOP lawmakers joined 210 Democrats to preserve federal funding for the National Endowment for Democracy, a nominally non-governmental organization that nonetheless feeds off the federal budget. The vote, held Wednesday, was on an amendment from Republican Rep. Eli Crane of Arizona that would have stripped NED of its taxpayer support.
Tonight, the Uniparty rejected my amendment to defund NED. 81 republicans voted with democrats to fund this rogue organization that fuels global censorship and domestic propaganda, Crane wrote on X, encapsulating the frustration of conservatives who see the Washington establishment closing ranks.
His use of Uniparty reflects a growing belief on the right that many elected Republicans are more interested in protecting the D.C. status quo than in defending their own voters from weaponized institutions.
Critics argue that calling NED merely partisan is far too mild, likening it to describing Napoleon as a leader with border issues technically accurate, but wildly understated. NED has become one of the leading outfits pressuring advertisers and platforms to cut off revenue from voices it brands as disinformation, a label that in practice often tracks closely with conservative or populist viewpoints.
The question, then, is what exactly NED and its network define as disinformation. X user DataRepublican a programmer who previously helped expose deep-seated problems at USAID conducted a detailed examination of the organizations intellectual ecosystem, starting with perhaps the most credentialed expert with NED, Rachel Kleinfeld. Her work offers a revealing window into the ideological assumptions that guide the institutions activities.
In 2022, Kleinfeld authored a paper titled Five Strategies to Support U.S. Democracy, which on its face sounds benign. One of those strategies was not simply to help Democrats win elections; in fact, she suggested that merely electing Democrats was insufficient to safeguard what she calls democracy.
Instead, Kleinfeld argued for cultivating what she termed responsible conservatives, a kind of curated opposition acceptable to the progressive establishment. A democracy cannot exist with illiberal, antidemocratic politicians in charge, she wrote, condemning Republicans who opposed certifying the 2020 Electoral College results without further investigation as an angry minority of voters who, due to the two-party system, pose an existential challenge to democracy itself.
In this framework, if Democrats cannot effectively choose the kind of Republicans they face, then democracy itself is said to be at risk. The logic only makes sense if one accepts an underlying authoritarian premise: that political pluralism is dangerous unless tightly managed by the left and its institutional allies. The language of saving democracy thus becomes a fig leaf for marginalizing any conservative movement that refuses to play by progressive rules.
Kleinfeld further contended that the left must reduce social demand for the right for illiberal policies on issues such as DEI and entrenched establishment power by vaguely addressing these social forces. In practice, this has often looked like lecturing disfavored groups that they have never had it so good and should therefore remain quiet while their cultural and political influence is steadily eroded. The goal is not compromise but conditioning the public to accept progressive dominance as normal and inevitable.
She also urged activists and institutions to engage the left in defending democracy by making it deliver, a phrase that critics interpret as code for expanding government programs and redistributive policies socialism with a smiley face. The rhetoric of delivery masks a familiar agenda: more centralized power, more bureaucracy, and more taxpayer money funneled through ideologically aligned organizations.
Kleinfelds strategy, by her own admission, requires sticks as well as carrots and insists there are red lines that must be upheld for democracy to work. Those red lines conveniently align with the lefts cultural and political priorities, turning dissent on core issues into something beyond the bounds of legitimate debate. Once again, democracy is defined not as the will of the people, but as adherence to a progressive policy checklist.
Kleinfeld is NED. This is what NED believes, DataRepublican concluded in his analysis. I cannot emphasize enough what a stupid, foolish, idiotic thing it is for Republicans to support NED. They are either mentally retarded or secretly Democrats. His blunt assessment reflects a broader conservative anger at Republicans who continue to fund institutions openly hostile to their own base.
Nor was the pro-NED vote confined to the usual moderate suspects, though they were certainly present. Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York opposed Cranes amendment, as did Kentucky Rep. Andy Barr, who is positioning himself to succeed Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell when he retires in 2026.
These are figures widely touted as future leaders of the Republican Party, yet they cast votes to sustain an organization that, by its own intellectual lights, seeks to delegitimize and defeat the very voters who put them in office. They are effectively underwriting an apparatus that aims to defund conservative media, stigmatize populist dissent, and narrow the range of acceptable opinion on the right. For grassroots conservatives, it is difficult to see this as anything other than political self-sabotage.
Crane, however, insists that the fight is far from over. This weeks votes in Congress teach an important lesson. For decades, the swamp has gotten away with passing garbage because they know folks wont notice, he wrote, suggesting that exposure and public scrutiny are the first steps toward change.
Well those days should be over. Pay attention. Ask tough questions. A handful of us will keep fighting to expose it. The hope among many on the right is that, as more Republicans grasp what NED and similar entities actually stand for, that handful will grow into a critical mass willing to stop funding institutions that treat conservative America as a problem to be managed rather than a constituency to be represented.
Login