President Donald Trump has privately voiced deep dissatisfaction with Attorney General Pam Bondis performance, questioning both her toughness and her effectiveness as the nations top law enforcement officer.
According to the Daily Caller, a Wall Street Journal report published Monday detailed how President Trump has repeatedly criticized Bondi behind closed doors, describing her as weak and insufficiently aggressive in pursuing his political and legal priorities. His ire has reportedly focused on the Justice Departments failure to sustain high-profile cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after a judge dismissed the charges on the grounds of an allegedly improper appointment.
The president has not merely complained, but has actively explored potential remedies, including the appointment of special counsels to revive or replace stalled efforts. Those close to the matter say he is pressing for faster, more decisive legal action against adversaries who, in his view, have long operated with impunity while weaponizing the justice system against conservatives.
Tensions between the president and Bondi have been further inflamed by a long-running controversy over her handling of document releases tied to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. That episode damaged her credibility with key segments of President Trumps base and triggered sharp internal criticism from within the White House itself.
I think she completely whiffed on appreciating that that was the very targeted group that cared about this, White House chief of staff Susie Wiles told Vanity Fair in December, referring to Bondis management of the Epstein document release. For many conservative activists who have demanded full transparency on Epsteins network and its powerful associates, Bondis approach was seen as tone-deaf at best and politically reckless at worst.
The dispute traces back to February 2025, when Bondi hosted a group of conservative influencers at the White House and handed out binders labeled The Epstein Files: Phase 1. Expectations were high, but disappointment was immediate, as much of the material had already appeared in court filings and prior media reports.
Bondi framed the move as the start of a broader transparency campaign, with the Justice Department touting the first phase of declassified Epstein files. Yet the rollout quickly backfired on the right when the documents failed to produce the new names and explosive revelations many had anticipated, feeding a sense that the establishment was still shielding elites from scrutiny.
ABC News reported that senior White House officials were angered that Bondi had not briefed them in advance, leaving them blindsided by the backlash. Even staunch pro-Trump activist Laura Loomer blasted the effort as an unprofessional rollout, underscoring how badly the episode landed with some of the presidents most loyal defenders.
Wiles later told Vanity Fair that Bondi had handed out binders full of nothingness, then worsened the fallout by claiming a client list was sitting on her desk a statement Wiles flatly rejected. Conservative commentator Liz Wheeler, one of the influencers who received a binder, publicly demanded to know why phase 1 contained nothing, as the controversy evolved into a litmus test of loyalty and credibility among pro-Trump media figures, according to The Washington Post.
Bondis allies have mounted a public defense, insisting she is being unfairly maligned and arguing that a methodical, phased release is the only responsible way to handle sensitive material. President Trump, for his part, has attempted to project unity in public even as reports suggest he remains exasperated in private.
Trump told the Journal that Pam is doing an excellent job in a Friday statement. Yet the widening gap between his public praise and private frustration raises questions about how long Bondi can retain his confidence if she continues to fall short of the aggressive, no-nonsense posture conservatives expect from an attorney general tasked with confronting a deeply entrenched liberal legal and bureaucratic apparatus.
Login