CBSs Jan Crawford Torches Liberals For Targeting the Supreme Court (Video)

Written by Published

In a pointed critique of her colleagues, CBS News chief legal correspondent Jan Crawford took aim at the media's portrayal of the Supreme Court during a recent discussion.

According to Mediaite, Crawford was asked by Margaret Brennan to highlight the most overlooked story of 2025. She responded by addressing the narrative that the Supreme Court is corrupt, particularly in light of its decision to overturn a significant ruling and its perceived alignment with President Trump.

"Not only is that narrative overreported, it is patently false, and it is dangerous for the institution, and the publics faith and confidence in the rule of law," Crawford asserted. She emphasized that while the court is conservative, having been so for two decades, labeling it as corrupt is a grave mischaracterization.

Crawford further elaborated on the underreported aspects of the Supreme Court's work over the past 20 years. She noted the court's focus on its role relative to other government branches and its efforts to restore accountability within the constitutional framework.

"Again, this is a court that is functional, it is consistent," she stated, highlighting the justices' diverse interpretations of the Constitution and federal law. As the nation approaches its 250th anniversary, she underscored the importance of understanding the court's role in maintaining the rule of law, which she believes is crucial for preserving democracy.

Margaret Brennan acknowledged the gravity of Crawford's remarks, particularly her assertion about the potential threat to democracy. Crawford reiterated her concern, saying, "If the public lose confidence in the rule of law, I dont know what that means for democracy." She criticized the rhetoric surrounding alleged corruption as "profoundly irresponsible," a sentiment echoed by another panelist who noted the threats such rhetoric can incite. Crawford agreed, emphasizing the real-world consequences of undermining trust in the judicial system.

As the conversation unfolded, Crawford's insights highlighted the need for a more nuanced understanding of the Supreme Court's role and decisions. Her comments serve as a reminder of the importance of maintaining faith in the judiciary, a cornerstone of American democracy.