In a controversial move, Democratic Representative Elissa Slotkin, alongside other party members, released a video urging U.S. military personnel to reject what they termed as "illegal" orders from President Donald Trump.
This video, which many have criticized as seditious, has sparked significant backlash. Slotkin, now attempting to clarify her stance, recently spoke with the left-leaning outlet, The Daily Beast, to explain the motivations behind the video.
According to Gateway Pundit, Slotkin claimed that the video was a response to concerns expressed by numerous military members. "Certainly, since we made the video, people have been finding their way to us just to say, hey, weve been expressing this angst amongst ourselves," Slotkin stated.
"This was not coming out of nowhere." This assertion suggests that the video was intended to address the unease among service members regarding the execution of potentially unlawful orders.
The video featured six Democratic lawmakers, all of whom have military backgrounds, including Slotkin, Senator Mark Kelly, and Representatives Chrissy Houlahan, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander, and Jason Crow. They reminded military personnel of their oath to uphold the Constitution and their right to refuse illegal orders under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. "Know that we have your back, because now, more than ever, the American people need you," the lawmakers declared.
While the video did not specify which orders were deemed illegal, its release coincided with heightened scrutiny over President Trump's deployment of federal troops in U.S. cities and his administration's actions against alleged drug operations in the Caribbean. Critics argue that the timing and content of the video suggest it was a reactionary measure rather than a genuine response to military concerns.
Skeptics, particularly from conservative circles, question the authenticity of Slotkin's claims. They suggest that the video was inspired by anti-Trump sentiment, possibly influenced by a columnist from The Atlantic, and criticize the Democrats for not considering the potential ramifications of their actions. The call for military personnel to defy orders from their Commander in Chief is seen by many as reckless and deserving of serious repercussions.
The debate over the video underscores the ongoing tension between the Trump administration and its critics, highlighting the broader discourse on the role of the military in domestic affairs and the boundaries of lawful orders. As the political landscape remains polarized, the implications of such actions continue to provoke intense discussion.
Login