Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen has stirred controversy by suggesting that President Donald Trump's military actions against Venezuelan drug vessels might amount to a "war crime.
".
This assertion was made during an appearance on NBC's This Week, where Van Hollen engaged in a discussion with host Jonathan Karl regarding a report from The Washington Post. The report alleged that Secretary of War Pete Hegseth had ordered a subsequent strike on a Venezuelan drug vessel, following an initial attack that left two survivors.
According to Gateway Pundit, the conversation between Van Hollen and Karl delved into the legal implications of the strikes. When questioned about the potential for a war crime, Van Hollen responded, "I think its very possible there was a war crime committed. Of course, for it to be a war crime, you have to accept the Trump administrations whole construct here." He further elaborated on the administration's stance, which frames the situation as an armed conflict with drug gangs. Van Hollen criticized this perspective, stating, "If that theory is wrong, then its plain murder."
He emphasized that if the administration's legal theory is flawed, the initial strike could be considered murder, and even if the theory is accepted, it would still constitute a war crime. Van Hollen concluded by asserting that the Secretary of Defense should be held accountable for such orders.
The Democrats' fervent allegations arise amidst increasing indications that President Trump is contemplating military action against Venezuela and its leader, Nicols Maduro. On Saturday, Venezuelan airspace was notably quiet following President Trump's announcement of its closure.
Speculation is rife that Maduro may have already fled the country, fearing a potential military intervention, although these reports remain unverified.
The situation underscores the complexities of international law and military engagement, particularly when addressing the global drug trade. While the Trump administration's approach seeks to tackle the issue head-on, critics argue that it risks overstepping legal boundaries.
As the world watches, the unfolding events in Venezuela could have significant implications for U.S. foreign policy and international relations.
Login