The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) remains steadfast in its efforts to deport individuals deemed the "worst of the worst" within the United States.
Despite facing numerous attempts by critics to hinder its mission and erode public support, the department continues its campaign unabated.
As reported by The Blaze, David Bier, Director of Immigration Studies at the Cato Institute, recently contested the prevailing narrative surrounding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detentions. Bier presented "new data" suggesting that the majority of those detained by ICE are not the dangerous criminals often portrayed. "Most 'criminals' had immigration, traffic, and vice offenses. Not the 'worst of the worst,'" Bier stated.
A pie chart accompanying his findings indicated that between October 1 and November 15, 73% of ICE detainees had "no conviction," with a mere 5% classified as "violent" offenders.
Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut seized upon this data, asserting, "This is the scandal. Trump isnt targeting dangerous people. Hes targeting peaceful immigrants. Almost exclusively." In response, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin addressed Bier's claims through Senator Murphy's post, emphasizing the broader context: "law enforcement and fool Americans."
She clarified that approximately 70% of illegal aliens arrested possess active criminal charges or convictions, excluding those wanted internationally for crimes, gang affiliations, or ties to terrorism. McLaughlin further underscored a fundamental point: "By the way, every single one of these illegal aliens broke our nations laws by being in the country illegally."
The ongoing debate highlights the tension between maintaining national security and addressing concerns over the treatment of immigrants, with both sides presenting data to support their positions. As the DHS continues its operations, the discourse surrounding immigration enforcement remains a contentious issue in American politics.
Login