Rand Paul Twice Blocks Kennedys Effort To End Congressional Pay During Schumers Shutdown

Written by Published

In the midst of the ongoing government shutdown, Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) has proposed legislation that would halt congressional pay until the crisis is resolved.

However, his fellow Republican, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), has twice objected to these proposals, arguing that the focus should be on reopening the government and paying those who are working.

Kennedy's proposed legislation, dubbed the "No Shutdown Paychecks to Politicians Act," aims to suspend congressional pay during the shutdown and eliminate back pay once government funding is restored. According to Gateway Pundit, Kennedy believes his proposal is both simple and fair, as it would ensure lawmakers share the financial burden currently experienced by federal employees like air traffic controllers, military service members, and staffers who are working without pay.

However, Paul has been quick to voice his objections. He argues that withholding pay from lawmakers distracts from the larger issue of bureaucratic dysfunction and the unfair treatment of federal workers who continue their duties during the shutdown. Instead, Paul has proposed an alternative, the Shutdown Prevention and Pay Workers Act, which would ensure essential government workers, including the military, are paid during any future shutdowns.

Kennedy, however, rejected Paul's amendment, accusing him of derailing a bill that could pass both chambers and be signed into law. Kennedy's insistence on his own bill's potential success was met with Paul's firm belief that the focus should be on paying those who are working, rather than punishing members of Congress.

Paul, who identifies as one of the most conservative members of the Senate, expressed his belief that it is not clear that President Trump wouldn't sign a bill to continue paying federal workers. He argued that it's a universal sentiment among both parties and the American people, particularly among soldiers, that workers should continue to be paid during the shutdown. He also criticized the Democrats for objecting to his proposal, challenging them to explain why they don't want to pay air traffic controllers.

Despite Paul's objections, Kennedy remained undeterred and introduced a second bill, the "Withhold Member Pay During Shutdowns Act." This version would temporarily escrow congressional pay during the shutdown, releasing it only after the government reopens. Yet again, Paul objected, maintaining his stance that the solution lies in paying workers, not withholding pay from lawmakers.

The ongoing government shutdown has sparked a heated debate among lawmakers, with differing views on how to handle the financial implications for those affected. While Kennedy's proposals aim to share the financial burden among lawmakers, Paul's objections highlight the need to focus on the workers who continue to serve despite the shutdown.

As the shutdown continues, the debate over how to address the financial consequences for those affected remains unresolved.