Hollywood Star Reveals Backlash Over Charlie Kirk Assassination Grief Post 'Nearly Broke' Her

Written by Published

Kristin Chenoweth, the acclaimed actress and Broadway luminary, recently opened up about the intense public backlash she faced following a social media post concerning the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

In a candid discussion with the Hollywood Reporter, Chenoweth disclosed that the criticism she received "nearly broke" her. Her remarks were made in the context of promoting her latest role in the musical, The Queen of Versailles.

According to The Post Millennial, Chenoweth's comment on Kirk's last Instagram post, "Im. So. Upset. Didnt always agree but appreciated some perspectives. What a heartbreak," sparked significant backlash, particularly from the LGBTQ+ community, which constitutes a substantial portion of her fan base.

Despite the controversy, Chenoweth, a known advocate for LGBTQ+ rights, expressed her dismay at the situation, stating, "I saw what happened [to Kirk] online with my own eyes, and I had a human moment of reflection. Its no secret that Im an advocate for the LGBTQ+ community."

Chenoweth further elaborated on the emotional toll the incident took on her, telling the Hollywood Reporter, "It was tough on me, but Im not going to answer any questions about it because I dealt with it. It nearly broke me, and thats all Im going to say. You probably know my heart, so you probably know." Her decision to refrain from further comment underscores the personal impact of the backlash and her desire to move forward.

The incident with Chenoweth echoes a similar experience faced by actress Jamie Lee Curtis, who also found herself embroiled in controversy over comments related to Kirk. Curtis had previously remarked, "I mean, I disagreed with him on almost every point I ever heard him say. But I believe he was a man of faith, and I hope in that moment when he died, that he felt connected to his faith."

Her comments, as reported by Fox News, were later clarified in an interview with Variety, where Curtis explained, "An excerpt of it mistranslated what I was saying as I wished him well like I was talking about him in a very positive way, which I wasnt; I was simply talking about his faith in God."

Curtis's reflections highlight the challenges of navigating public discourse in today's polarized environment. She noted, "In the binary world today, you cannot hold two ideas at the same time: I cannot be Jewish and totally believe in Israels right to exist and at the same time reject the destruction of Gaza. You cant say that, because you get vilified for having a mind that says, I can hold both those thoughts. I can be contradictory in that way."

These incidents underscore the complexities faced by public figures when expressing nuanced views in an era where social media often demands clear-cut positions. Both Chenoweth and Curtis illustrate the difficulties of maintaining personal integrity while navigating the expectations of diverse audiences.

As they continue their careers, their experiences serve as a reminder of the importance of thoughtful discourse and the courage required to express one's beliefs amidst potential backlash.