Former special counsel Jack Smith's decision to prosecute President Donald Trump has been met with skepticism by CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig, who has openly questioned the timing of Smith's actions in relation to the 2024 presidential election.
Smith's denial of any political influence on his decision has been dismissed as "ludicrous" by Honig, who argues that the rush to bring the case to trial was undeniably influenced by the upcoming election.
According to the Daily Caller, Smith, during a conversation with former prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, vehemently denied any political motivation behind his two indictments against Trump. However, Honig, during his appearance on "CNN News Central," contended that Smith, despite not being overtly partisan, was clearly influenced by the impending 2024 election. "Jack Smith is not a partisan, per se. Hes not going into this with a D or an R behind him. But he is, to use Abbes [Lowell] phrase, a heat seeking missile, Honig stated.
He further argued that Smith's eagerness to expedite the case and bring Trump to trial before the 2024 election led him to "overextend and bend ordinary rules and procedures."
Honig's critique of Smith's actions extends to his denial of any awareness of the 2024 election. Its undeniable that he was thinking about and acting with the 2024 election in mind in asking the judge to change ordinary rules and procedures and I think its wrong for him to deny that and claim I had no awareness of the 2024 election. I think the record belies that, Honig asserted.
Smith's charges against Trump were extensive, including 37 felony counts filed in June 2023, 31 of which fell under the Espionage Act. These charges were based on allegations that Trump had unlawfully stored classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. However, these charges were dismissed by Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, in July 2024, on the grounds that the appointment of a special counsel violated the appointments clause of the Constitution.
In addition to these charges, Smith also accused Trump of attempting to interfere in the 2020 election, leading to four additional felony counts against the former president. These charges included "conspiracy to defraud the United States," "conspiracy to corruptly obstruct and impede the Jan. 6 proceedings," and "a conspiracy against the right to vote and to have ones vote counted."
The timing of the trial for these charges was another point of contention. Smith requested a trial date of January 2, 2024, just before the Iowa Caucus, while Trump's legal team requested a later date in April 2026. The trial was eventually scheduled for March 4, 2024, by U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee.
The Supreme Court's ruling in July 2024, granting immunity from prosecution for any official act taken by the president, further complicated the case. This ruling necessitated a superseding indictment from Smith to comply with the immunity ruling. A redacted version of Smiths 165-page brief against Trump was released by Chutkan in October 2024, just weeks before the election.
Following Trump's election victory, Smith dismissed the case in accordance with the Department of Justice (DOJ) policy that sitting presidents do not face prosecution. However, the House Judiciary Committee has since called on Smith to testify before Congress about his handling of the prosecutions against Trump.
This ongoing saga continues to fuel debates about the intersection of politics and the judicial process.
Login