In the wake of the tragic assassination of conservative Christian figure Charlie Kirk, reactions from the left have been notably divided.
On one hand, there are those who openly revel in the event, while others cloak their satisfaction in a veneer of sanctimony. Among the latter is comedian Trevor Noah, who, during a recent performance at New York City's Comedy Cellar, managed to elicit laughter from his liberal audience by highlighting what he deemed the "funny" aspect of Kirk's assassination.
Noah, known for his tenure as host of Comedy Central's "The Daily Show," approached the sensitive topic with a characteristic liberal flair, employing a dubious method to deliver his "jokes" about the murder. Initially, Noah claimed he had no intention of discussing Kirk, but he felt compelled to address it due to the self-imposed restraint of other comedians.
As reported by Western Journal, Noah remarked, "You cant say theres nothing funny about it," referring to Kirk's murder. He further commented, "The guy was shot while defending guns. Do you understand how ? Im not even writing that as a joke. As a human, you have to admit, that is an incongruous, funny thing that happens."
The performance, available on YouTube, has sparked significant backlash. One user on the social media platform X expressed their disgust, stating, "When people show you who they are, believe them. This is beyond disgusting." Meanwhile, Rob Schmitt of Newsmax criticized Noah, labeling him a "failed late-night host" and "an obscure comedian."
Schmitt's assessment is supported by viewership statistics; according to Forbes, Noah's debut as "The Daily Show" host in September 2015 drew 3.47 million viewers, but by August 2022, shortly before his departure, the audience had dwindled to an average of 383,000.
Noah's logic suggests that if one supports the Bill of Rights and subsequently falls victim to violence, it somehow becomes a source of humor. This perspective, however, is not the most disturbing aspect of Noah and his liberal counterparts.
More troubling is their insincere condemnation of Kirk's murder, coupled with their slanderous rhetoric that has the potential to incite violence among unstable individuals on the left. It raises the question of whether they tacitly endorse violence against those they perceive as suitable targets.
This incident underscores a broader issue within liberal circles, where the line between free speech and incitement is often blurred. The selective outrage and double standards exhibited by figures like Noah highlight a troubling trend of trivializing violence when it suits their ideological narrative.
As conservatives, it is crucial to remain vigilant and continue advocating for genuine discourse that respects the sanctity of life and the principles enshrined in the Constitution.
Login