In a compelling opinion piece for RedState, Eli Shepherd, a self-described peaceful and pastoral individual, argues against the infusion of cultural sensitivity into the U.
S. military.
Shepherd contends that the military's primary mission is to fight and protect, not to comfort or engage in social experiments. This perspective aligns with a recent speech by Pete Hegseth, who called for a military stripped of "wokeness" and focused solely on national defense.
Hegseth's speech, as reported by Shepherd, was a clarion call to abandon identity politics within the military. He criticized the presence of "identity Months," "DEI offices," and "Climate Change Worship," urging a return to traditional military values. Hegseth's message was clear: "No more division or Distraction - No more Gender Delusions America is BACK."
Shepherd emphasizes that the military's role is not to engage in ideological posturing but to deter aggression and defend the homeland. He echoes Hegseth's rejection of diversity mandates and symbolic promotions, advocating for a focus on readiness, unity, and ferocity.
According to Shepherd, "A fighting force doesnt win wars by checking cultural boxes."
The opinion piece highlights Hegseth's call for uniform and gender-neutral standards, arguing that strong standards filter rather than discriminate. Shepherd supports the notion that if individuals, regardless of gender, can meet these standards, they should serve. This approach, he argues, is realistic and necessary for maintaining excellence within the ranks.
Shepherd also addresses the issue of leadership within the military, criticizing a culture of "risk aversion" and over-sensitive policies. He supports Hegseth's stance that enforcing discipline is crucial for effective leadership, noting that "Troops want leadership they can trust."
One of Hegseth's boldest assertions, as reported by Shepherd, is that the military should remain apolitical and resist cultural fads. Shepherd argues that the real politicization occurs when the military carries ideological baggage, and he stresses the importance of loyalty to the Constitution and American security.
Shepherd acknowledges that reform will come with costs, such as stricter grooming rules and higher fitness demands. However, he warns that the alternative is a military weakened by mediocrity and division. "Our adversaries dont care about 'inclusivity metrics.' They care about weakness," he writes.
In closing, Shepherd asserts that Hegseth's speech was a necessary reset for the military, emphasizing that its primary duty is to protect the nation. He concludes with a biblical reference, underscoring the need for a military that is prepared for battle, not one that resembles a focus group.
Login