Bessent Warns Mamdani Could Drive New York Into BankruptcyAnd Dont Expect A Bailout!

Written by Published

In the realm of politics, the potential election of Zohran Mamdani as New York City's mayor has sparked significant debate.

His proposed policies, rooted in socialist ideology, have drawn criticism from various quarters, with many predicting dire economic consequences for the city.

Critics argue that Mamdani's approach could lead to a mass exodus of the city's productive residents, a collapse in tax revenues, and a subsequent deterioration of city servicesoutcomes often associated with socialist or communist governance.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has been vocal about the potential fallout from Mamdani's economic plans. As reported by RedState, Bessent foresees a scenario where New York City, under Mamdani's leadership, would seek financial assistance from the federal government.

However, Bessent has made it clear that such a request would be met with a firm refusal. "I guarantee you, and there're not a lot of things in life that are sure, but New York City will be coming to the federal government for a bailout if Mamdanis plans are implemented,"

Bessent stated during an interview with FOX Business' Maria Bartiromo. When asked if he would grant such a bailout, Bessent replied, "It will be the same thing that Gerald Ford said. Drop dead."

Bessent's concerns extend beyond the immediate financial implications. He warns of a broader economic shift, noting that New York risks losing its tax base if Mamdani's policies are enacted. "All the high earners, all the businesses. If you look back over the past five years, weve already seen the greatest transfer of wealth in U.S. history from Manhattan County to Palm Beach County," he explained.

This trend of migration from high-tax, progressive areas to more economically conservative regions is not unique to New York. California, once a beacon of prosperity, is experiencing a similar outflow of residents to states like Texas, Florida, and Tennessee.

The principle at stake here is whether the federal government should intervene in situations where local governments, through their own policy choices, create economic turmoil. Bessent and others argue that such interventions are unwarranted, as these are not natural disasters but rather the result of deliberate political decisions.

The sentiment is that the voters who elect such leaders should bear the responsibility for the outcomes of their choices. As H.L. Mencken famously remarked, "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."

The potential election of Mamdani and the implementation of his agenda could serve as a cautionary tale for other progressive cities and states. The consequences of such governance, critics argue, will be felt most acutely by the residents themselves. Despite the gravity of these concerns,

Mamdanis campaign has remained silent, declining to comment on the matter when approached by FOX Business. This silence leaves many questions unanswered, as New Yorkers and observers alike ponder the future of the city under Mamdani's proposed leadership.