During a recent segment on MSNBC's "The Weekend," Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson expressed strong opposition to the potential deployment of the National Guard to his city by President Donald Trump.
Johnson warned that such a move would provoke a significant backlash from Chicago residents, who he believes would resist what he described as "tyranny."
In a discussion with co-host Jonathan Capehart, the conversation turned to a report from The Washington Post. Capehart highlighted a passage indicating that the deployment of thousands of active-duty troops in Chicago had been considered, albeit deemed less likely at the moment.
Reflecting on past actions, Capehart noted, "We saw him do that with active duty Marines on the streets of Los Angeles. What would the reaction be in Chicago if the President of the United States does indeed put active duty military on the streets of Chicago?"
According to Breitbart, Mayor Johnson responded emphatically, stating, "Well, again, you know, the city of Chicago does not need a military occupied state that that is thats not who we are." He praised the efforts of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and others who resisted similar measures, labeling such actions as "authoritarianism."
Johnson emphasized that federal troops lack the police power and specialized training that local officers possess, rendering them ineffective in enforcing local law.
Johnson further criticized the President's approach, pointing to what he perceives as a lack of understanding in managing urban environments. "The President has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to what, arrest nine people in D.C.?" he questioned, suggesting that this demonstrated a disconnect with the complexities of governance. He assured that Chicago would take legal measures if necessary and expressed confidence in the city's resilience.
"The people of this city are accustomed to rising up against tyranny," he asserted, adding that he believes Chicagoans would stand with him in his efforts to safeguard the city.
The mayor's remarks underscore a broader debate about the role of federal intervention in local matters, particularly in cities with distinct governance challenges. As discussions continue, the focus remains on balancing security needs with respect for local autonomy and community values.
Login