California Governor Gavin Newsom appears to be adopting a strategy reminiscent of President Donald Trump in his ongoing battle over redistricting.
By posting emphatic messages in all capital letters on X, Newsom seems to be channeling the style of Trump's communications on Truth Social. In one of these posts, Newsom boldly declares his intention to "end the Trump presidency," a statement likely linked to his efforts to assist Democrats in seizing control of the U.S. House through the redrawing of California's congressional districts, potentially leading to Trump's impeachment.
According to Breitbart, Newsom's attempts to mimic Trump lack the humor and authenticity of the original. This latest endeavor is part of a broader pattern where the California governor attempts to emulate aspects of Trump that he previously derided.
For instance, last month, Newsom appropriated Trump's phrase "rake the forests" to shift blame onto the federal government for the persistent wildfires in California, despite the fact that the Palisades Fire and Eaton Fires ignited on state-owned land.
Redistricting remains Newsom's primary focus, even as thousands remain displaced due to the fires. He is betting that Democratic primary voters prioritize opposition to Trump over a candidate's record of serving constituents. After two terms, Newsom's list of accomplishments is sparse, prompting him to concentrate on social issues and disputes with Republican-led states.
His stance on transgender issues, such as denying parents the right to be informed about their children's gender changes, is at odds with the majority of voters in California.
Byron York of the Washington Examiner commented on Newsom's approach, stating, "Newsom, turning himself into a parody of Trump while thinking the same old same old will succeed this time, is a good example of a man with someone else living rent-free in his head." This observation underscores the notion that Newsom's fixation on Trump may not yield the desired results.
As Newsom continues to navigate his political landscape, his strategy raises questions about the effectiveness of imitating a figure he once criticized. With limited achievements to his name, his focus on social issues and partisan battles may not resonate with voters who are more concerned with tangible results and effective governance.
Login