In a groundbreaking ruling, a French court has decreed that all Palestinians residing in the Gaza Strip are now eligible to apply for asylum in France.
This decision, the first of its kind, was made in response to a case brought forth by a Palestinian mother seeking asylum following the October 7th terror attacks on Israel by the Islamist group Hamas.
According to Breitbart, the National Court of Asylum (CNDA) in France ruled in favor of the woman, citing the "war methods" employed by the Israeli Defence Forces in Gaza as "serious enough to be regarded as methods of persecution." This ruling effectively overturned a previous decision by the French Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Effrusion (OFPRA) in November.
The OFPRA had previously argued that the woman was not being specifically "persecuted," thus only qualifying her for "subsidiary protection," a lesser form of asylum that offers a four-year temporary residence permit as opposed to the ten years of protection guaranteed to refugees.
This landmark case has set a precedent for the CNDA to declare that all Palestinians living in Gaza should be entitled to asylum protection in France, as reported by Le Figaro. The court's decision was grounded in the Geneva Convention, which stipulates that individuals facing "persecution for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion," should be considered refugees.
Despite France, like many other nations, not recognizing Palestine as a state, the court specifically highlighted the supposed persecution based on "nationality" experienced by Palestinians in Gaza. The judges argued that they possessed the "characteristics" of a nationality, which, according to the Convention, encompass belonging to a "group determined by its cultural, ethnic or linguistic identity, common geographical or political origins or its relationship with the population of another state."
While this ruling is unprecedented in declaring such "persecution" of Palestinians, legal experts have noted that it would likely only affect approximately 20 per cent of the population of Gaza. This is due to the fact that 80 per cent are already classified as refugees by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) and are thus already eligible for protection in France.
The ruling has been praised by leftist groups such as Amnesty International. However, it has also sparked concerns about the potential influx of more Palestinians into France. Among those expressing apprehension is Henda Ayari, a former Muslim turned anti-Islamist activist and women's rights campaigner.
Ayari voiced her concerns, stating, "While France is already grappling with explosive community tensions, it chooses today to unconditionally welcome refugees from Gaza, even though more than 30 Muslim countries refuse to take them in. Why should France, once again, play the role of humanitarian substitute while others categorically refuse to host these populations in their countries?"
She further highlighted the potential risks associated with welcoming individuals from a region where Hamas recruits, and where Islamist ideology and anti-Semitic, anti-Western sentiment are deeply ingrained.
Ayari's concerns underscore the potential implications of this ruling, not only for France but also for the broader global community. As the world watches, the question remains: How will this decision impact the geopolitical landscape and the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
Login