The narrative surrounding land ownership in South Africa has been a contentious issue, with claims circulating that black South Africans, who make up over 80% of the population, own a mere 4% of private land.
This assertion has been propagated by various media outlets, including CNN, and has been used to justify the South African government's policy of land expropriation without compensation. However, the accuracy of this claim has been called into question.
According to Breitbart, CNN's Anderson Cooper recently reiterated this claim, stating, "30 years after apartheid, black South Africans are over 80 percent of the population, but still only own 4 percent of private land." Cooper's statement was part of a broader discussion on the South African government's land reform policies, which have been criticized by President Donald Trump and others as being racially discriminatory against white Afrikaners.
Cooper also referenced a law passed last year in South Africa that allows the government to seize land without payment in certain cases, a move that supporters argue is an attempt to rectify the injustices of apartheid. However, Cooper dismissed concerns about this policy, stating, "The president says its a genocide and thats not true."
However, the South Africas Institute of Race Relations (IRR) has contested the accuracy of the 4% figure. The IRR argues that the data on land ownership has been misrepresented, leading to a distorted public understanding of the issue.
The frequently cited claim that 72% of the countrys farmland is owned by white people as opposed to only 4% owned by black people lacks proper contextualization, according to the IRR.
Terence Corrigan, Projects and Publications Manager at the IRR, has criticized the narrative surrounding the 72%-4% split, arguing that it conveys the message that 'nothing has changed.' He asserts that this narrative overlooks the modest land reform successes that have been achieved and fails to acknowledge that land to which black people have historically had access has been state property and remains so three decades after the transition.
The IRR has also pointed out that, according to the controversial 2017 land audit, black South Africans own the majority (56%) of land in urban areas. The governments figures, the IRR argues, serve to exaggerate the discrepancy between white-owned and black owned-land for political purposes.
While it is likely that black South Africans own disproportionately less land, including farmland, than white South Africans, the assertion that they only own 4% of the land is not accurate. Furthermore, the policy of expropriation of white-held land without compensation, which is now permitted under South African law, raises serious moral and economic questions.
These concerns are dismissed by Cooper, who portrays the policy as entirely justified and unproblematic, a stark contrast to the fears of many Afrikaners who view it as a potential precursor to a "genocide."
The debate over land ownership in South Africa is complex and fraught with historical and racial tensions. However, it is crucial that the discussion is based on accurate information and that all perspectives are considered.
Misrepresentations and oversimplifications of the issue only serve to further inflame tensions and hinder the path to a fair and equitable solution.
Login