In a shocking revelation, the White House has accused The New York Times of omitting crucial details in their coverage of a disturbing incident on the New York City subway.
The case involves Felix Rojas, a 44-year-old man accused of heinous crimes against the deceased Jorge Gonzalez, aged 37. The New York Post reported that Rojas allegedly committed these acts on April 8, around 11:45 p.m., in a subway car.
According to the New York Post, prosecutors have detailed Rojas's actions, which were captured on surveillance footage. The footage reportedly shows Rojas rifling through Gonzalez's pockets, allegedly to rob him, before returning to sexually assault the man's corpse.
Prosecutors noted that Rojas repeatedly zipped up his pants and pulled up Gonzalez's trousers as the train stopped, attempting to avoid detection. The assault reportedly lasted over 30 minutes, with Rojas pausing his actions at station stops to evade discovery. The Post further revealed that Rojas is an illegal alien from Mexico, having crossed the border at least five times. However, as reported by Gateway Pundit, The New York Times failed to mention Rojas's immigration status in their coverage.
The Department of Homeland Security's main X account provided corrections to ensure the accuracy of the headline. The Trump White House also highlighted this omission, pointing out that it is not the first instance of The New York Times obscuring critical details about crimes committed by illegal aliens. They referenced a 2015 report where the paper referred to an illegal alien who murdered five people as a "Brooklyn man," implying he was a lifelong U.S. resident.
Rojas now faces multiple charges, including rape and grand larceny, and is being held without bail. This case raises significant concerns about media transparency and the portrayal of immigration-related crimes.
The omission of Rojas's immigration status by a major publication like The New York Times underscores the ongoing debate about media bias and the importance of providing the public with complete and accurate information. As this case unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the need for accountability in journalism, particularly when reporting on sensitive issues that impact public perception and policy.
Login