The current assault on Social Security is not a measure of efficiency, but rather a betrayal of a long-standing promise to the American people.
Both Democrats and Republicans should rally to safeguard this vital program, which is not a handout but a hard-earned benefit.
According to Fox News, Social Security is a pact between the American government and its citizens. Workers contribute to the program throughout their careers, and upon retirement, they receive their contributions back to support their golden years. However, this time-honored agreement is under unprecedented attack.
High-profile figures such as billionaire Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick have suggested that seniors would not protest if they missed a Social Security check. Elon Musk, the renowned entrepreneur, has labeled Social Security as the "worlds biggest Ponzi scheme." Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been tasked with dismantling the agency, leading to mass layoffs, office closures, and potential cuts to phone services.
The consequences of such drastic measures are twofold: an increase in errors in delivering checks to Americans and a decrease in staff to rectify these errors. When checks fail to reach their rightful recipients, it effectively reduces the benefits they have earned.
The impact of these changes is already evident. Following DOGE's intervention, Ned, a retiree from Washington state, was erroneously declared "dead" in the Social Security system, leading to the withdrawal of $5,000 in benefits from his bank account and the cessation of his monthly checks. Despite his efforts, Ned has yet to be reimbursed for two months of missing checks.
Similarly, Tom and Chris from Westborough, Massachusetts, discovered that their autistic son's disability benefits through Social Security had been abruptly terminated. Although the funds were eventually reinstated, the incident caused significant distress and financial uncertainty.
The reduction in Social Security staff and the closure of regional offices have further compounded these issues. Americans are now forced to travel long distances to seek assistance with their applications or missing benefits. Upon arrival, they are often met with long lines and extended wait times.
Musk and DOGE justify their actions by citing "extreme levels of fraud," alleging that millions of deceased individuals over the age of 100 are receiving payments. However, this claim is contradicted by the current Social Security Acting Administrator Leland Dudek, who was appointed by Donald Trump in February.
If Musk and DOGE genuinely aim to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse within the federal government, there are more effective strategies available. I have proposed 30 measures that could potentially save $2 trillion in government waste. Dismantling the Social Security Administration, thereby disadvantaging our seniors, veterans, and disabled citizens, is not among these suggestions.
Even President George W. Bushs Social Security Administration Commissioner has criticized Musk and DOGE's approach, stating that while there are ways to enhance efficiency within the agency, their current tactics resemble those of "22-year-old frat boys that have never seen the system."
Musk has admitted to the possibility of making mistakes, and his attack on Social Security is a glaring example. Rather than acknowledging the harm caused by DOGE's takeover of Social Security, he has doubled down on his stance, even encouraging President Trump to echo his false claims. This approach has been deemed a "real disservice to President Trump" by President George W. Bushs Social Security Commissioner, and more importantly, a profound disservice to the American people.
Instead of undermining Social Security services and jeopardizing Americans benefits, we should be fortifying the program. With rising costs and dwindling retirement savings, a temporary increase in benefits could provide much-needed relief. Additionally, lifting the cap on the amount millionaires and billionaires contribute to Social Security could ensure the system's long-term stability and allow for a permanent expansion of benefits.
Social Security should not be a partisan issue. Its creation was supported by an overwhelming majority of Congress members from both parties. Even as the current administration seeks to dismantle the agency, Republicans are witnessing the fallout firsthand, with reports of long lines at offices, extended phone wait times, and website crashes from their constituents in states like Arizona, Indiana, and Pennsylvania. The question remains: why are Democrats the only ones expressing concern about the future of Social Security?
Login