Conservative voices have been increasingly vocal about what they perceive as judicial overreach by Democrat-appointed judges, particularly in cases affecting former President Trump's initiatives to streamline and enhance the accountability of the federal government.
In a recent development, the CEO of X and chairman of DOGE, Elon Musk, has proposed a novel approach to address this issue.
According to The Gateway Pundit, a federal judge has temporarily blocked Musk's government efficiency team from accessing a crucial Treasury Department system. US District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, appointed by Barack Obama, justified the decision by citing potential "irreparable harm." This ruling halts access to a sensitive payment system responsible for distributing tax returns, Social Security benefits, disability payments, and federal employees' salaries. Furthermore, Engelmayer has mandated the destruction of any data downloaded from the system by those with access since January 20, the day of Trump's inauguration.
In response to the ruling, Musk expressed his frustration, labeling it as "absolutely insane!" and suggesting that "Something super shady is going (on) to protect scammers." In light of these events, Musk has proposed a bold solution to counteract what he views as "legislating from the bench." His plan involves having elected bodies identify and dismiss the least effective judges annually. "Id like to propose that the worst 1% of appointed judges, as determined by elected bodies, be fired every year," Musk stated on X. He believes this measure "will weed out the most corrupt and least competent."
Musk's proposal has garnered significant support from users on X, who largely agree with his approach to ensuring judicial accountability. This idea reflects a broader conservative sentiment favoring reforms that promote transparency and efficiency within government institutions.
Login