GOP strategist Brad Todd expressed skepticism on Friday regarding Tulsi Gabbard's prospects for confirmation as President Donald Trump's nominee for director of national intelligence.
His concerns centered on Gabbard's performance during her confirmation hearings, particularly her reluctance to unequivocally denounce Edward Snowden for his actions in leaking classified government information and subsequently seeking refuge in Russia to evade prosecution.
According to Raw Story, Todd remarked, "I think Tulsi Gabbard's hearing was a little rough. I mean, you have to be able to say Edward Snowden is a traitor to win over the hawks in the hawk party. I think that was a mistake on her part." This sentiment underscores the importance of aligning with the party's more hawkish elements, especially when seeking confirmation for a role as critical as director of national intelligence.
Michael Warren, an editor at the conservative outlet The Dispatch, offered an even more pessimistic view of Gabbard's chances. He suggested that her nomination might face significant hurdles in the committee stage, stating, "I think there are a lot of indications that, from that hearing and from the reaction to her answers, that there are Republicans -- Susan Collins and Todd Young are the ones everybody is watching, I think we should watch their words, what they say. They're on that committee. If they don't vote for her, it doesn't get out of committee." Warren's comments highlight the pivotal role of key Republican senators in determining the fate of Gabbard's nomination.
The unfolding situation raises questions about Gabbard's ability to navigate the political landscape and secure the necessary support from her own party. With influential figures like Collins and Young under scrutiny, the outcome of her nomination remains uncertain.
Login