Compelled Speech In Schools? THIS Case Could End Up At The Supreme Court

Written by Published

In a recent opinion editorial published by the Daily Caller, Frank Ricci, a Fellow at Yankee Institute, has raised concerns over the potential infringement of First Amendment rights in the case of Parents Defending Education v.

Olentangy Local School District Board of Education.

Ricci argues that the school district's policy, which mandates students to refer to each other based on self-defined gender identity, compels speech that may contradict deeply held beliefs about biological sex.

Ricci writes, "The Olentangy Local School Districts policy must be struck down." He further explains that the policy is not merely an administrative overreach, but an assault on students' First Amendment rights to express their views on sex and gender without fear of coercion or reprisal.

The case, according to Ricci, is about more than policy. He states, "This case is about more than policy. It encompasses the very essence of what it means to be free in thought and expression, particularly in our educational institutions." Ricci believes that the policy imposes a new linguistic and social orthodoxy to which students must conform or face punishment.

Ricci also criticizes the argument that such policies create a psychologically "safe" environment for all students. He contends that perceived "safety" for some should not come at the expense of freedom for all. He writes, "The policy at issue does not limit itself to the constitutionally permissible goal of preventing harassment; instead, it imposes a new linguistic (and social) orthodoxy to which students must conform or else be punished."

Ricci warns that the enforcement of such policies could lead to a chilling effect on speech, where students self-censor rather than risk punishment for using language that aligns with their personal beliefs. He further argues that the policy fails to meet the stringent requirements set forth by the Supreme Courts precedent on content-based restrictions.

Ricci concludes his piece by emphasizing the importance of protecting each individual's freedom to speak truth as he or she sees it. He quotes Emily Dickenson, saying, "Truth is such a rare thing, it is delightful to tell it." He adds, "For the sake of our nations future, we must protect each individuals freedom to speak truth as he or she sees it."