Wait, What?!?! Murdered CEO Sparks WILD Celebrations All Over The Country (And Media!)

Written by Published

In a shocking turn of events, Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, was brutally murdered on Wednesday morning.

The crime, which has sparked an intense manhunt, has also led to an unexpected outpouring of anger towards the healthcare industry, with some even celebrating Thompson's death. The motive behind the murder remains unclear, but a significant clue lies in the words "deny," "depose," and "defend" etched into the ammunition discovered at the crime scene.

According to Mediaite, the killer remains at large and has become the subject of widespread admiration among those who are deeply frustrated with the healthcare system. Many of these individuals view the murderer as a vigilante, exacting revenge for some perceived harm inflicted by Thompson's company.

In the aftermath of the murder, there has been considerable discussion about the shooter's professionalism and cool demeanor. The prevailing belief among this group is that the killer was seeking retribution for a loved one wronged by UnitedHealthcare. Some have even suggested that the anti-health insurance slogans found on the bullets could be a clever diversion by a hitman.

Taylor Lorenz has emerged as the face and voice of those celebrating Thompson's death. Despite criticism, Lorenz has continued to express her satisfaction over Thompson's demise, dismissing those who object as "pearl-clutchers." However, focusing on Lorenz's actions alone does not address the larger issue at hand. While it is a matter of personal taste whether one chooses to express satisfaction at another's death, celebrating an assassination is a different matter entirely.

The aftermath of Thompson's murder has seen an alarming trend of other CEOs being singled out on social media, leading to plans for increased security. Lorenz has attempted to differentiate between feeling satisfaction at the death of someone perceived as harmful and actively encouraging violence. However, this distinction crumbles under scrutiny. For instance, if Donald Trump had expressed satisfaction at the death of migrants he considered criminals, while insisting he wasn't promoting violence, it would be clear that he was indeed encouraging violent actions.

Lorenz's statements, while controversial, are likely tame compared to the rest of the murder fans' comments. The real danger lies not in the explicit celebrations of the crime, but in the mature response to it. On a recent edition of a news show, anchor Kasie Hunt and her panelists condemned the murder but also discussed the "frustration" fueling those who have cheered it on.

The panelists acknowledged the deep frustration people have with the healthcare system and predicted that this incident could lead to changes. If the murder was indeed motivated by a tragic policy outcome, it could be what the shooter intended - to make other health insurance CEOs and the government think twice before harming someone else.

This is a dangerous precedent, as the list of people who run companies or organizations that have harmed people, or are perceived to have done so, is endless. If this murder leads to changes that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise, it could trigger chaos. This isn't just a philosophical argument; it's a practical one. If the world sees that a cold-blooded murder can bring about change, more violence is likely to follow.

The man who carried out the Planned Parenthood clinic mass shooting several years ago claimed he was "saving the babies." Imagine if those murders had resulted in more restrictive abortion policies. Or consider those who believe "meat is murder." People often overlook unintended consequences or dismiss them casually. This assassination could lead to changes that negatively impact people in a collateral way. It's just as likely that insurance companies and legislators will respond with increased surveillance and law enforcement powers as it is that they will abandon harmful practices that generate profits.

It's alarming that it needs to be stated, but violence begets more violence, and celebrating assassination is a step towards societal ruin and vigilante chaos. This should serve as a reminder to all - murder is not something to be celebrated.