In a recent development, a New York appeals court has indicated a potential willingness to reconsider, or even reduce, the hefty $454 million judgment against Donald Trump, the 2024 GOP presidential candidate.
This judgment was the result of a civil fraud case led by New York Attorney General Letitia James.
As reported by The Post Millennial, the appeal was presented by Trump's legal team, who criticized the ruling of New York Judge Arthur Engoron as "draconian, unlawful, and unconstitutional." D. John Sauer, Trump's representative in the hearing, argued that the case was a blatant violation of the statute of limitations. He further asserted that there were "no victims" and "no complaints" from insurers and lenders in relation to Trump's business operations. Sauer pointed out that the transactions scrutinized in the non-jury trial were over a decade old.
Sauer expressed concern that if the verdict stands, it could create an environment of fear and uncertainty in the real estate industry. Judge Peter H. Moulton, one of the panel members, also raised questions about the nature of James' lawsuit, suggesting it may have morphed into "something it was not meant to do." He expressed unease over the "immense penalty in this case."
In September, prior to the non-jury trial, Engoron had ruled that Trump and the Trump Organization had engaged in years of fraud by inflating his wealth and the value of assets on financial statements used to secure loans and deals. In February, Engoron ordered Trump to pay $354 million. Additionally, his sons Don Jr. and Eric, along with former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg, were directed to pay millions.
The initial judgment against Trump has seen a rapid increase due to accruing interest. In March, an appeals court reduced Trump's bond payment to $175 million. Despite these legal setbacks, Trump remains resolute, vowing to take the case "all the way up to the US Supreme Court if necessary."
While the outcome of this appeal remains uncertain, it underscores the ongoing legal challenges faced by Trump and his organization. The case also raises questions about the potential implications for other businesses and the real estate industry at large.
Login