In a landmark ruling on Wednesday, a federal court sided with Elon Musk's X Corp, striking down California's contentious content moderation laws on the grounds of free speech infringement.
X Corp had previously initiated legal proceedings to halt the implementation of the law, which came into effect at the start of 2024.
The law in question mandated social media companies to disclose the specifics of their content moderation policies to the state or risk civil penalties, according to The Post Millennial. However, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco reversed a preceding lower court's verdict that had ruled against suspending the enforcement of the state law. The three-judge panel concluded that the law was in direct violation of the First Amendment, as reported by Reuters.
Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr., in his case opinion, stated, "X Corp. is likely to succeed in showing that the Content Category Report provisions facially violate the First Amendment."
In September 2023, X Corp filed a complaint arguing that Assembly Bill 587 infringed upon the company's First Amendment rights. The company contended that the law coerced "companies such as X Corp. to remove, demonetize, or deprioritize constitutionally-protected speech that the State deems undesirable or harmful," thereby meddling with the "constitutionally-protected editorial judgments" of the company. The lawsuit further claimed that the law imposed an "unjustified and undue burden" on social media companies. This lawsuit was initially dismissed by US District Judge William Shubb in December 2023.
Assembly Bill 587, enacted last September, was designed to combat extremism, hate speech, and online misinformation. As reported by Forbes, the law stipulated that online businesses collecting personally identifiable information from Californians must make their privacy policies readily accessible to the public.
The lawsuit contended that the "true intent" of the legislation was to pressure social media platforms to "eliminate" certain constitutionally-protected content deemed "problematic" by the State.
In a statement, X's Global Government Affairs said, "Today, a bipartisan panel of judges unanimously ruled in favor of X and against a California law that seeks to regulate speech on social media platforms. This is not just a victory for our platform, but also for free speech nationwide. Whether in the United States or around the world, X will always fight for free speech and against government efforts to restrict people's right to express themselves."
This ruling underscores the ongoing tension between government regulation and the preservation of free speech, particularly in the realm of social media. It serves as a reminder that the battle for free expression, even in the face of potential misinformation and harmful content, remains a cornerstone of our democratic society.
Login