In a recent development, Judge Tanya Chutkan presided over the first hearing since the Supreme Court's July 1 immunity ruling in the case against potential 2024 presidential contender, Donald Trump, concerning the events of January 6.
Trump's legal representative, John Lauro, entered a plea of not guilty on behalf of his client, who was not in attendance at the hearing.
According to The Post Millennial, Judge Chutkan acknowledged Trump's plea, to which Lauro confirmed, "That is right." The judge then stated, "I will consider his arraignment for the superseding indictment to be complete."
On August 27, Special Counsel Jack Smith issued a superseding indictment against Trump. This indictment echoed the four counts from the original 2023 indictment but was modified to align with the Supreme Court's immunity ruling. The ruling clarified that a president possesses absolute immunity for his core constitutional powers, but not for unofficial acts.
Earlier this week, a court document revealed that Trump intended to plead not guilty and would be waiving "my right to be present at Arraignment."
During the hearing, Judge Chutkan highlighted two key issues that required attention. The first pertained to the resolution of the immunity question, and the second concerned the future schedule of proceedings.
As this story continues to unfold, it is crucial to stay updated with the latest developments. The implications of this case could significantly impact the political landscape, particularly with the potential presidential race of 2024 on the horizon.
Login