New York Times National Correspondent Jeremy Peters acknowledged that a growing slate of Democratic Socialists of Americaaligned candidates routinely falter when pressed to explain how their ideology differs from Communism, whether they actually embrace Marxism, and how any of it would realistically pull the United States out of its deepening affordability crisis.
The exchange unfolded on HBOs Real Time, where host Bill Maher used recent examples to argue that higher education has abandoned rigorous learning in favor of ideological conditioning, a trend he believes has now bled into electoral politics, according to Breitbart. Maher charged that the rot in higher educationstarted long ago, when they stopped teaching people things, because they became indoctrination centers, and he pointed to two interviews from the week as evidence that left-wing activism has outpaced basic competence.
Maher first cited Megan Romer, the co-chair of the DSA, who appeared on New Yorker editor David Remnicks podcast and delivered a textbook case of sloganeering without substance. She was on David Remnicks podcast, and she talked about taxing the hell out of them, and he said, what do you mean by that? And she said, well, I dont really have a solid, and then just dribbled off, Maher recounted, noting that Remnick pressed her further: And he said, but shouldnt you? Shouldnt you be more specific about what taxing the hell means?
Mahers point was blunt: They dont know anything, okay. He then turned to another example, describing how Lindsey Grahams sister who was running and is now running in South Carolina, she was asked about Taiwan, and she said, Im not that informed on social on national security, a response Maher dismissed outright with the reminder, Well, youre running for the Senate. Thats not an answer that is acceptable.
CNN host and Chief Political Correspondent Dana Bash attempted to soften the critique by praising Remnicks interview as a needed reality check for would-be officeholders. I will say that interview that David Remnick did with the DSA chair, its something that everybody should watch, as an hopefully, an antidote to what you just said, Bash argued, insisting that This isnt this is, like, real life. This isnt just a string of slogans put together, its actual policy that, when you get to a place where youre running for elected office, or if you actually are successful in elected office, youve got to know stuff.
Peters, however, underscored that Romers performance was not an isolated misstep but part of a broader pattern among candidates aligned with the Democratic Socialists of America. Yeah. And, by the way, theres been a slew of interviews just like this, where candidates who represent the Democratic Socialists of America have really struggled to articulate how they dont subscribe to Communism, whether or not they really believe in Marxism, and basic facts about how their ideology would help them govern the United States out of this affordability crisis, he said, highlighting a disconnect between radical rhetoric and governing reality.
He acknowledged that some figures on the left are undeniably skilled political communicators, even as they operate within or adjacent to the DSA orbit. Look, a lot of these people are really talented politically. I think Mamdani is a generational political talent, Peters said, adding, Hes out of the Democratic Socialists of America. El-Sayed in Michigan is also very talented. Hes not a Democratic Socialist, although they do claim him as one of their own.
Yet Peters stressed that the broader crop of socialist-leaning hopefuls tends to emerge from activist circles steeped in theory rather than practical governance. But, by and large, a lot of these candidates come out of the activist wing of the party. Theyre very academic, theyre very into reading Karl Marx and left-wing theory, he observed, concluding that weve seen, time and time again, that a lot of them just dont withstand the scrutiny.
Earlier in the program, Peters had already cautioned that some of them are not quite ready for primetime, lets be clear, but a lot of them have really done a good job of selling themselves to the public as quite reasonable, mainstream politicians. For voters concerned about economic stability, national security, and the competence of those seeking high office, the spectacle of candidates unable to define taxing the hell out of them or to discuss Taiwan policy underscores a deeper conservative warning: when ideology outruns knowledge, the public is left to pay the price.
Login