In a recent development that has sent shockwaves through the political landscape, six lawmakers have come under scrutiny for their alleged involvement in a video that seemingly encourages soldiers to defy orders.
The lawmakers, who have since been dubbed the "Seditious Six," are accused of manipulating the Uniform Code of Military Justice to insinuate sedition. The group includes Sens. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan and Mark Kelly of Arizona, and Reps. Chris Deluzio and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, and Jason Crow of Colorado.
According to Gateway Pundit, the controversy surrounding these six lawmakers has deepened with allegations of money laundering. Investigative Reporter and Citizen Journalist, Bob Cushman, has released an analysis of Federal Election Commission (FEC) data that suggests the lawmakers have been recipients of illegally laundered campaign funds.
Cushman's initial investigation cites 22 instances of suspicious contributions, totaling nearly three million dollars, made to Democratic coffers. All six members of the Seditious Six have reportedly received funds from these questionable sources.
The investigation also raises concerns about the identities of the donors, referred to as "smurfs," being hijacked without their knowledge. Interviews conducted by James OKeefe, Charlie LeDuff, and Bob Cushman have revealed that these individuals were unaware of their identities being used in this manner.
In a revealing discussion between Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Charlie LeDuff and campaign strategist Jason Roe, it was disclosed that ActBlue, a fundraising platform for Democrats, has allegedly received over 16 billion dollars since 2004. The conversation also revealed that several senior members of ActBlue have resigned following allegations of fraud and the initiation of federal investigations in 2025.
Roe stated that individuals working within political campaigns for many years have been aware of the money laundering facilitated by ActBlue. He commended LeDuff for his insightful explanation of how ActBlue laundered money, a feat that mainstream media has yet to accomplish.
The allegations against the Seditious Six are detailed in a summary provided by Cushman, who has indicated that he will be forwarding this evidence to the appropriate authorities.
The FEC records reveal a series of suspicious donations made by individuals who are predominantly senior citizens. For instance, David Hutton, a 71-year-old from Paso Robles, CA, is recorded to have made 14,047 donations totaling $344,339 over seven years. This equates to an average of 5.5 donations per day, a frequency that raises questions about the legitimacy of these contributions. Hutton's donations have reportedly been made to all members of the Seditious Six.
Similarly, Daphne Sanderson, a 72-year-old from Cape May, NJ, is recorded to have made 1878 donations totaling $24,018. William Hardy, a 69-year-old from Stratham, NH, has reportedly donated $148,768 in 3,189 separate donations. Robert Degrasse, a 71-year-old from Bethesda, MD, is recorded to have donated $78,972 over 1,510 donations. These records suggest a pattern of identity theft targeting senior citizens.
The FEC records also reveal a series of small donations, often $2 or less, which are inconsistent with typical donation behavior. This pattern is seen in the donation records of several individuals, including David Rosenstein, a 72-year-old from Santa Monica, CA, who has allegedly made donations totaling $308,030.
The FEC, whose mission is to protect the integrity of the federal campaign finance process, has been accused of complicity in this alleged money laundering operation. Critics argue that the FEC has failed to enforce campaign finance laws and ensure transparency, allowing platforms like ActBlue to exploit the system for nearly two decades.
As the investigation into these allegations continues, the role of the FEC and the involvement of the Seditious Six in this alleged money laundering operation remain under scrutiny. The evidence presented by Cushman paints a troubling picture of potential fraud and identity theft within the campaign finance system.
The implications of these allegations, if proven true, could have far-reaching consequences for the individuals involved and the integrity of the political fundraising landscape.
Login