Trump Sacks Another Wave Of Immigration Judges 100+ Gone Since Taking Office!

Written by Published

In a decisive move to uphold federal immigration laws, President Donald Trump has dismissed eight left-leaning immigration judges in New York, a city known for its sanctuary policies.

This action is part of a broader effort to remove activist judges who have been accused of undermining immigration enforcement.

The judges in question were stationed at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) headquarters at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan, a location that has witnessed numerous left-wing protests resulting in violent confrontations with ICE officers.

According to CBS News, this development is part of a larger trend, with over 100 immigration judges either being dismissed or resigning since January. One notable figure among the dismissed judges is Amiena Khan, an assistant chief immigration judge. Khan's record from 2019 to 2024 reveals that she adjudicated 620 asylum claims, granting asylum in 544 cases, offering other forms of relief in 12 cases, and denying relief in 64 instances.

As reported by TRAC Immigration, a nonpartisan research organization, Khan's approval rate of 89.6 percent starkly contrasts with the national average, where 57.7 percent of asylum claims were denied during the same period.

Critics from the Democratic Party and their allies in the media have been quick to condemn the Trump administration's actions, labeling the dismissals as unjustified. However, the administration argues that these judges have been obstructing efforts to deport illegal immigrants who pose risks to public safety, strain public resources, and congest the judicial system.

The administration contends that judges who oppose Trump's "America First" policies should seek electoral office if they wish to influence U.S. laws, rather than overstepping their judicial roles.

The dismissal of these judges underscores a broader debate about the role of the judiciary in immigration policy. The administration maintains that unelected judges should refrain from using taxpayer resources to advocate for foreign nationals, emphasizing that President Trump was elected to implement his policies, unlike the judges who have been accused of acting as "subversive agitators."

The message is clear: those who disagree with the administration's approach should either step aside or seek solace elsewhere.