A recent report has surfaced, alleging that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been monitoring wire transfers between the United States and Mexico as a means to identify and deport illegal immigrants during President Donald Trump's administration.
This revelation has sparked concerns over privacy and the extent of government surveillance.
According to American Military News, court documents from a federal criminal case in Hawaii reveal that ICE officials utilized financial wire transfer records to track down illegal immigrant Gregorio Cordova Murrieta before his apprehension in June.
Homeland Security Investigations Special Agent Tabitha Hanson, in a June 25 submission to a federal magistrate judge, disclosed that she pinpointed Cordova Murrieta's location through data obtained from wire transfer surveillance. As reported by Honolulu Civil Beat, Cordova Murrieta faced indictment in July for re-entering the United States illegally after a prior deportation to Mexico.
The surveillance efforts reportedly involved information from a money remittance company, which helped identify 11 instances where Cordova Murrieta sent remittances to individuals in Mexico since October 2021. This data also included the location of his residence in Aiea, Hawaii, leading to his arrest by ICE officials on June 26.
The Intercept highlighted that Jacquelyn Esser, the public defender for Cordova Murrieta, noted this case as the sole instance she had encountered where ICE employed financial transfers to locate illegal immigrants for deportation.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Hawaii has voiced its disapproval of these tactics. Salmah Y. Rizvi, the Executive Director, expressed concern over the implications of such surveillance, stating, It is disheartening to see ICE and HSI resorting to surveillance tactics that turn routine, lawful actions like sending money to loved ones into grounds for immigration enforcement.
Rizvi emphasized the potential chilling effect on Hawaii's immigrant community, which heavily depends on remittances to support families abroad, and the fear it instills in individuals performing everyday activities.
This development raises questions about the balance between national security and individual privacy rights. The use of financial surveillance to enforce immigration laws may be seen as a necessary measure by some, yet it also underscores the ongoing debate over government overreach and the protection of civil liberties.
Login