In January 2020, months before the surge of left-wing activism triggered by the death of George Floyd, author Christopher Caldwell released a controversial book that traced the roots of modern identity politics to the Civil Rights Act.
His book, "The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties," suggested that the enforcement mechanisms for contemporary progressivism were born from civil rights law. Caldwell argued that it was this law that gave birth to the HR bureaucracies that would eventually evolve into Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) departments.
He also claimed that civil rights law was responsible for forcing companies to censor speech that could create a "hostile work environment" and for the emergence of racial quotas through the concept of disparate impact.
Initially, Caldwell's book divided conservatives. However, as the Biden administration sought to institutionalize cultural progressivism, partly through the civil rights bureaucracies that Caldwell criticized, his once radical thesis became commonplace in conservative circles. Scholars on the center-right began publishing essays, legal articles, and books onthe dangers of overreach by DEI departments and the potential infringement on free speech in the workplace.
They argued that the original intent of the Civil Rights Act was being distorted to push a progressive agenda that was not only divisive but also counterproductive to the goal of achieving true equality.
Caldwell's book also sparked a broader conversation about the role of government in enforcing social change. Many conservatives argued that the government's role should be limited to ensuring equal opportunity, not dictating outcomes. They contended that the rise of DEI departments and the enforcement of racial quotas were examples of government overreach that undermined individual merit and freedom of speech.
On the other hand, progressives defended the role of DEI departments and civil rights law in promoting diversity and combating systemic racism. They argued that these measures were necessary to correct historical injustices and create a more equitable society. They also dismissed the notion that these measures were infringing on free speech, arguing that they were instead creating a more inclusive environment where everyone felt safe and valued.
Despite the controversy, Caldwell's book has undeniably shaped the discourse on identity politics and civil rights law. His thesis has forced both conservatives and progressives to reevaluate their positions and engage in a more nuanced debate about the role of government in enforcing social change.
Whether one agrees with Caldwell's arguments or not, "The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties" has undeniably made a significant contribution to our understanding of modern American politics.
Login