The political landscape is once again abuzz with the reemergence of James Carville, a seasoned Democratic strategist known for his colorful commentary.
In a recent podcast, Carville proposed a controversial strategy for the Democratic Party: the addition of new states and the expansion of the U.S. Supreme Court. His rationale? To "save democracy."
According to The Hill, Carville suggested, "They are just going to have to unilaterally add Puerto Rico and District of Columbia as states, Theyre just going to have to do it. And they may have to expand the [Supreme Court] to 13 members."
This bold proposal comes on the heels of his advice to Democrats to allow the President to "punch himself out" of favor with the American public. Carville's remarks highlight his belief in the necessity of drastic measures, particularly in light of Republican efforts to increase their influence, such as the push for five additional House seats in Texas before the 2026 midterms.
Carville acknowledged the contentious nature of his suggestions, stating, "Any of those things in isolation I would be skeptical about. I would be cautious about."
His comments have sparked debate, with conservative voices like Guy Benson offering pointed critiques. Benson, speaking on FOX Business, questioned whether Republicans should adopt similar tactics, such as creating new states, to "save democracy."
This discourse underscores a broader ideological clash over what constitutes democratic preservation. While Carville's proposals may resonate with some on the left, they also raise questions about the implications of such actions on the nation's political balance.
As the debate continues, the core issue remains whether these strategies truly serve democracy or merely partisan interests.
Login