San Francisco is on the brink of implementing a ban on homeless individuals residing in recreational vehicles (RVs), citing the need for clear sidewalks and the prevention of trash accumulation.
The policy, which is slated for final approval by San Francisco supervisors, is expected to impact at least 400 RVs in the city, which is home to approximately 800,000 residents. These RVs serve as a refuge for those unable to afford traditional housing, including immigrant families with children.
However, Mayor Daniel Lurie and other supporters of the policy argue that RVs are not suitable for long-term habitation, and the city has a responsibility to provide shelter for those in need and maintain cleanliness in public spaces.
As reported by the Associated Press, Kunal Modi, an advisor to the mayor on health, homelessness, and family services, stated, We absolutely want to serve those families, those who are in crisis across San Francisco. We feel the responsibility to help them get to a stable solution. And at the same time, we want to make sure that that stability is somewhere indoors and not exposed in the public roadway.
However, critics of the plan argue that it is inhumane to force individuals to relinquish their only form of shelter in exchange for a chance at conventional housing, especially when there are insufficient units to accommodate all those in need. The mayor's plan only offers additional funding to assist 65 households. Jennifer Friedenbach, executive director of the Coalition on Homelessness, expressed concerns that city officials are significantly behind in establishing the details of an accompanying permit program.
This program would exempt RV residents from parking restrictions, provided they are working with homeless outreach staff to secure housing.
Friedenbach said, I think that theres going to be people who lose their RVs. I think theres going to be people who are able to get into shelter, but at the expense" of people with higher needs, like those sleeping on a sidewalk.
In recent years, San Francisco, like many other U.S. cities, has witnessed a surge in the number of people living out of vehicles and RVs due to escalating living costs. The proposed ban on oversized vehicles is part of Mayor Lurie's commitment to clean up San Francisco's streets. It also aligns with a growing trend to compel homeless individuals to accept offers of shelter or face the risk of arrest or vehicle towing.
The proposal stipulates a two-hour parking limit citywide for all RVs and oversized vehicles longer than 22 feet or higher than 7 feet, irrespective of whether they are being used as housing. Under the accompanying permit program, RV residents registered with the city as of May are exempt from the parking limits.
In return, they must accept the city's offer of temporary or longer-term housing and dispose of their RV when it's time to move. The city has allocated over half a million dollars to purchase RVs from residents at $175 per foot. The permits will be valid for six months.
Carlos Perez, 55, an RV resident, told supervisors at a hearing this month that he could not afford the city's high rents. Perez, who works full-time as a produce deliveryman and supports his brother, who is unable to work due to a disability, said, We dont do nothing wrong. We try to keep this street clean. Its not easy to be in a place like this.
Another RV resident, Zach, who requested to be identified by his first name to not jeopardize his ability to get work, started living in the vehicle a dozen years ago after realizing that no matter how hard he worked, he still struggled to pay rent. Now he works as a ride-hail driver and pursues his love of photography. He parks near Lake Merced in the city near the Pacific Ocean and pays $35 every two to four weeks to properly dispose of waste and fill the vehicle with fresh water. He says Lurie's plan is shortsighted. There is not enough housing available and many prefer to live in an RV over staying at a shelter, which may have restrictive rules.
Despite the criticism, the mayor's new proposal comes with more money for enhanced RV parking enforcement and an additional $11 million, largely for a small number of households to move to subsidized housing for a few years. Officials acknowledge that this may not be sufficient to house all RV dwellers, but note that the city also has hotel vouchers and other housing subsidies.
Erica Kisch, CEO of nonprofit Compass Family Services, which assists homeless families, says they do not support the punitive nature of the proposal but are grateful for the extra resources. Its recognition that households should not be living in vehicles, that we need to do better for families, and for seniors and for anyone else who's living in a vehicle," she said. San Francisco can do better, certainly.
The proposed policy reflects a broader trend in U.S. cities to address the issue of homelessness, particularly those living in vehicles. As the cost of living continues to rise, the debate over the best approach to this issue remains contentious.
While some see the policy as a necessary step towards maintaining public order and cleanliness, others view it as a punitive measure that fails to address the root causes of homelessness. As the city of San Francisco moves forward with this policy, the impact on its homeless population will be closely watched.
Login