Richard Stengel, who served in the Obama administration as the Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, has recently stirred controversy with his remarks on MSNBC regarding U.
S. alliances in the Middle East.
Known for his support of Obama's Iran Deal, Stengel's latest comments have raised eyebrows among conservatives and others who question his perspective on Iran and Israel.
During his appearance on MSNBC, Stengel suggested that Iran might be a more suitable ally for the United States than Israel, a statement that has sparked significant debate. As reported by the Washington Free Beacon, Stengel, who served under President Obama, questioned the rationale behind the U.S. alignment with Israel over Iran, which he described as "the most Western nation" in the region.
Despite acknowledging the infamous "death to America" chants often heard in Iran, Stengel attempted to downplay their significance by highlighting Iranians' appreciation for American culture and cinema. "Why is it a foundation issue for Trump that Iran doesnt have a nuclear weapon?" he queried, further questioning, "Why are we allied with Israel?"
Stengel recounted a personal experience from a 2014 visit to Iran, where he witnessed young Iranians chanting against America. However, he emphasized a subsequent encounter with two young men who expressed their admiration for American culture. "I was sitting at a rally," he recalled. "These young guys were chanting death to America. They finished the chants. And two young men came over and said, Are you American? I said yes, [and they said,] We want to welcome you to our country. We love American culture. We love American movies.'"
Stengel's assertion that "Iran is the most Western nation in the whole Middle East" and that the U.S. shares more commonalities with Iran than with some of its current allies has been met with skepticism. Critics argue that such views reflect a distorted understanding of geopolitical realities and question the wisdom of aligning with a nation whose leadership has openly expressed hostility toward America.
This perspective, which seems to challenge traditional alliances, underscores a broader debate about the direction of U.S. foreign policy.
For conservatives, the notion of prioritizing relations with a nation that has historically been antagonistic to American interests is perplexing. The question remains: what drives such a narrative, and what implications does it hold for the future of U.S. alliances in the Middle East?
Login