Tucker Carlson, a prominent figure in journalism, has issued a grave caution against any potential U.S. military action targeting Iran.
He described such a move as "suicidal" and warned of the dire consequences that would ensue. "Whatever you think of tariffs, its clear that now is the worst possible time for the United States to participate in a military strike on Iran," Carlson expressed on X.
He further elaborated, "Thousands of Americans would die. Wed lose the war that follows. Nothing would be more destructive to our country. And yet were closer than ever, thanks to unrelenting pressure from neocons. This is suicidal. Anyone advocating for conflict with Iran is not an ally of the United States, but an enemy."
As reported by WND, Carlson's remarks emerge amidst escalating tensions between the White House and Iran. The latter has been implicated in supporting Houthi terrorist assaults on American vessels in the Middle East, alongside its ongoing military engagements against Israel.
President Donald Trump, in a post on Truth Social dated March 31, stated, "The Iran-backed Houthi Terrorists have been decimated by the relentless strikes over the past two weeks. Many of their Fighters and Leaders are no longer with us. We hit them every day and night Harder and harder. Their capabilities that threaten Shipping and the Region are rapidly being destroyed. Our attacks will continue until they are no longer a threat to Freedom of Navigation. The choice for the Houthis is clear: Stop shooting at U.S. ships, and we will stop shooting at you. Otherwise, we have only just begun, and the real pain is yet to come, for both the Houthis and their sponsors in Iran."
Adding to the discourse, Ron Paul, a former U.S. congressman and Republican presidential contender, also voiced his concerns regarding potential military action against Iran. On March 31, Paul remarked, "That didnt take long. A candidate elected to end current wars and avoid new ones, Donald Trump as president has significantly escalated the war on Yemen and is now threatening to attack Iran. He is also threatening Russia (again) with punitive tariffs. What is it about the White House that turns every resident into a warmonger?"
The debate over military intervention in Iran underscores a broader conversation about America's foreign policy direction. While some advocate for a more assertive stance, others, like Carlson and Paul, caution against the potential repercussions of such actions. As the situation unfolds, the implications for U.S. interests and global stability remain a critical focus of discussion.
Login