In a significant departure from previous U.S. climate and energy policy, President Donald Trump's initial week in office was marked by a clear emphasis on energy independence.
The administration rolled back regulations deemed burdensome and once again withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement, citing the agreement's disproportionate economic burden on the United States.
As reported by RedState, one of Trump's most impactful actions was the reversal of Obama-era climate policies, which were largely based on the EPA's Endangerment Finding. The President's executive actions underscored the pressing need to reconsider and ultimately revoke the Endangerment Finding. This 2009 EPA directive forms the backbone of the federal government's extensive climate agenda, leading to regulations that inflate consumer costs, damage industries, and extend government intrusion into nearly every facet of life.
The Endangerment Finding controversially classified carbon dioxide (CO2) and five other greenhouse gases as pollutants under the Clean Air Act. This allowed the EPA to regulate these gases, despite the Clean Air Act's original intent to address harmful pollutants like smog, soot, and sulfur dioxidesubstances with direct and immediate adverse health impacts.
Contrarily, carbon dioxide is neither toxic nor harmful at current atmospheric levels. It is a naturally occurring gas, crucial to life on Earth, and plays a vital role in plant growth and food production. By declaring CO2 a pollutant, the EPA dramatically expanded its regulatory reach. This finding paved the way for extensive mandates on power plants, vehicles, appliances, and more, granting the federal government a license to micromanage industries and individual choices.
The political and media narrative surrounding climate change has unjustly vilified CO2. While CO2 is indeed a greenhouse gas, its role in the climate system is far from straightforward or all-encompassing. For instance, water vapor is the most significant greenhouse gas in terms of its warming potential, yet it is rarely discussed because it is beyond the scope of regulation.
The Endangerment Finding has triggered a cascade of regulations with far-reaching and often harmful consequences for industries, consumers, and the broader economy. One of its greatest flaws is its narrow focus. By concentrating almost exclusively on CO2, it overlooks the broader environmental picture.
The push for renewable energy also has downsides that are often overlooked. Wind and solar energy require vast amounts of land, disrupt ecosystems, and rely on mining rare materials that cause significant environmental damage. Meanwhile, the policies driven by the Endangerment Finding disproportionately harm low-income households, which are least able to absorb rising energy and food costs.
President Trump's rollback of climate policies highlighted the dangers of the Endangerment Finding but did not go far enough. To truly safeguard Americas energy independence, economic growth, and individual freedoms, the Endangerment Finding must be rescinded. Its foundation is shakybuilt on exaggerated claims about CO2 and a misinterpretation of climate science. Eliminating it would free industries from burdensome regulations, lower costs for consumers, and restore balance to environmental policymaking.
Rescinding the finding would not mean abandoning environmental stewardship. Instead, it would allow for a more rational approach to climate and energy policyone that respects scientific complexity, avoids alarmism, and considers the real-world consequences of overreach. A balanced policy would prioritize innovation, voluntary efforts, and adaptation over heavy-handed mandates.
The EPAs Endangerment Finding, better understood as the Carbon Scare Framework, represents a gross overreach of regulatory authority. By declaring carbon dioxide a pollutant, the federal government has imposed costly and far-reaching rules that affect every aspect of life, often to the detriment of the economy, individual freedoms, and even the environment itself.
The path forward begins with rescinding the Endangerment Finding and reevaluating the role of CO2 in climate policy. America needs a balanced, evidence-based approachone that prioritizes innovation, economic freedom, and environmental stewardship without succumbing to alarmism or ideological agendas. If policymakers are serious about addressing real challenges, its time to step away from the carbon scare narrative and toward rational, practical solutions.
Login