Dr.
Eithan Haim of Texas, who faced legal action from the Biden administration's Department of Justice after he revealed that Texas Childrens Hospital was conducting illegal child sex change procedures, has seen his case dismissed.
This development follows the Trump administration's Department of Justice decision to drop the charges last Friday.
As reported by The Post Millennial, United States District Judge David Hittner stated in the ruling, "As the direct and only result of a joint motion of the parties, the United States Attorneys Office of the Southern District of Texas, and legal counsel for the defendant, Eithan David Haim, the Second Superseding Indictment and all open counts in the above-listed criminal case are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice." This decision marks a significant turn in a case that has drawn attention to the contentious issue of child sex change procedures and the role of the DOJ.
Dr. Haim, who was on the brink of trial, had previously expressed his concerns about the fairness of the proceedings. He remarked, "I am scheduled to go to trial in a few weeks in a place which has up until this point been nothing less than a kangaroo court. All of the most basic rules have been violated in favor of a corrupted DOJ and all of it has come at the cost of my constitutional rights." His statement highlights the ongoing debate over the perceived politicization of the Department of Justice.
In a further critique of the DOJ's actions, Haim noted, "The Trump administration took office a few days ago and issued an Executive Order to end the weaponization of the DOJ against its own citizens. But I can assure you that today that weaponization is just as alive as it was January 19th, 2025. Because the acting US Attorney is running cover while this weaponized prosecution is being accelerated behind closed doors in direct violation of the President's Executive Order." This underscores the tension between the current administration's policies and the actions of the DOJ.
The Biden administration's DOJ had attempted to impose a gag order on Haim, yet he defied this by issuing a statement to draw attention to his case, as noted by the Daily Wire. His post garnered significant public interest, amassing over a million views by Friday afternoon.
The DOJ had accused Haim of "obtaining protected individual health information for patients that were not under his care and without authorization," following his exposure of an underage child's sex change intervention, a practice prohibited by Texas law. This case raises critical questions about the balance between individual rights and governmental oversight in healthcare practices.
Login