Bill Gates, the billionaire philanthropist and tech mogul, has been known for his radical views, particularly in his support for global governance structures such as the World Health Organization and his advocacy for mandatory vaccinations.
His stance has been seen as extreme by many, especially those who question the efficacy and safety of vaccines.
According to WND, Gates has now ventured into a new controversial territory. He has proposed the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to censor individuals who express skepticism about vaccines, accusing them of "inciting violence." This comes in the wake of numerous reports of adverse reactions, including fatalities, from the COVID-19 vaccines that were mandated during the pandemic.
In a recent interview with CNBC, Gates equated questioning the safety and efficacy of vaccines developed by profit-driven corporations with inciting violence. As reported by Slay News, Gates is advocating for AI-driven censorship of the public if they challenge the official narratives about vaccines.
The report highlighted that Gates, who has been linked to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, made these remarks during his interview. "He was discussing the 'threat' of 'anti-vaxxers' and promoting plans for handling 'vaccine hesitancy' using 'real-time' censorship imposed by AI," Slay News detailed.
Gates argued that those urging people to avoid vaccines are "inciting violence" and thus pose a "threat" to the public. It's worth noting that Gates, with his vast wealth, has significant investments in various vaccine programs.
"He has become one of the most prominent advocates for mass-injecting the public, from the traditional antigen-based biologics to the experimental mRNA 'vaccines,'" which have reportedly harmed tens of thousands of individuals, the report added.
In addition to his advocacy for global vaccination, Gates has also been a vocal proponent of globalist climate change ideologies. He has proposed radical ideas such as eliminating meat consumption, promoting insect-based diets, and even blocking sunlight to combat global warming.
The report cautioned that this form of censorship could lead to the suppression of vaccine injury testimonials and the abolition of informed consent. It also highlighted Gates' call for "boundaries" on free speech.
"We should have free speech, but if you're inciting violence or causing people not to take vaccines, where are those boundaries?" Gates queried.
The question remains: where indeed should the boundaries of free speech lie? And who gets to decide? These are questions that society must grapple with as we navigate the complex intersection of public health, personal freedom, and the role of technology in our lives.
Login