In a recent episode of the Counsel Culture podcast, conservative commentator Candace Owens engaged in a spirited debate with liberal celebrity Nick Cannon.
Owens, known for her unapologetic conservative views, challenged Cannon's stance on transgender issues, leading to a thought-provoking exchange that underscored the ideological divide between the two.
As reported by Gateway Pundit, Cannon, a former Nickelodeon star and Americas Got Talent host, was previously dismissed by ViacomCBS due to his controversial remarks that were deemed racially insensitive. Despite his support for liberal causes such as Black Lives Matter and gun control, Cannon has also criticized Planned Parenthood and its founder, Margaret Sanger, for their alleged eugenics-based agenda.
Cannon's podcast, Counsel Culture, is touted as a platform for inclusive conversations on often taboo topics. The show aims to foster understanding and empathy rather than fueling the cancel culture phenomenon. However, the recent episode featuring Owens, who parted ways with The Daily Wire earlier this year following disagreements over foreign policy, took a different turn.
The crux of the debate revolved around the question of whether a man can become a woman and vice versa. Cannon argued that individual perception and belief should be respected, stating, Your perception of the world is different from someone elses because just as emphatic as you are that you believe what you just said, theres someone that believes emphatically the opposite.
Owens, however, countered this viewpoint, asserting the importance of objective truth. I believe there was objective truth, okay? A person that is born a man, okay, a person that is born with a penis, as we call it, okay, cannot ever grow up and give birth. Do we agree with that? she asked. Cannon conceded to this point, but questioned the implications for those who believe transitioning genders would improve their lives.
In response, Owens presented a compelling analogy to highlight the dangers of prioritizing subjective beliefs over objective truths. She referred to a group of people who identify as "minor-attracted," arguing that their belief in their right to engage in sexual relationships with children should not be validated simply because they believe it to be true. This argument led Cannon to admit, Thats a hell of a point.
Owens further elaborated on her stance, warning of the potential consequences of blurring the lines between truth and belief. She argued that compassion should not be used as a weapon to push personal agendas, and that society is on a dangerous path if it continues to prioritize feelings over facts.
Cannon acknowledged the gravity of Owens' argument, agreeing that such a scenario should not be allowed to happen. Owens concluded her argument by emphasizing the importance of truth, stating, This is what truth is, and if you cant deal with truth, then youre going to have a very tough life, way tougher than having to listen to Candace Owens say 'you are a man on the internet.'
The exchange between Owens and Cannon serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing ideological battles in our society. It underscores the importance of maintaining a balance between respecting individual beliefs and upholding objective truths. As the debate continues, it is clear that the conversation around these issues is far from over.
Login