The legal dispute between renowned YouTuber Tim Pool and Kamala HQ, the official representation of Kamala Harris' presidential campaign on social media, reached a satisfactory conclusion last Friday.
Although the specifics of the settlement remain undisclosed, Pool expressed his contentment with the outcome, sharing a screenshot that demonstrated the removal of the contentious post from Kamala HQ. Pool's lawsuit had demanded a retraction, and the deletion of the post essentially fulfills this request.
"I am pleased with the resolution of the lawsuit between myself, Tim Pool, and The Kamala Harris Campaign," Pool stated. He had previously alleged that the Kamala campaign had inflicted "reputational harm" upon him. While the removal of the post does not entirely rectify this damage, it does indicate that the campaign has acknowledged their false allegations against Pool.
When queried about his perception of the resolution and the broader societal implications, Pool expressed cautious optimism. "I believe we are making progress. We are winning," he said. However, he also pointed out recent events that cause concern, such as the ongoing trial of Daniel Penny and the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. "The verdict in the Daniel Penny case and the assassination of the CEO are stark reminders that the far-left remains a potent and dangerous force," he warned.
The lawsuit had its origins in September when Kamala HQ accused Pool of being a "Trump operative" and alleged that he advocated for the execution of those who did not support Trump if he were to win. This claim was based on a video clip from Pool's Timcast IRL, which was taken out of context. In reality, Pool was arguing against the death penalty and political retribution. Kamala HQ's misrepresentation of Pool's views was a significant factor in the initiation of the lawsuit.
According to The Post Millennial, Pool responded to the post by stating, "I have engaged legal counsel. We are preparing to take action. More to come." This action materialized when Pool filed a lawsuit against Kamala Harris' campaign, systematically debunking their allegations.
Kamala Harris' campaign had posted on social media, "Trump operatives say their Project 2025 plan is to give Trump total, unchecked legal power so they can jail and execute those who dont support Trump if he wins." This post was accompanied by an out-of-context clip, with an accusatory note that "They have since scrubbed this video from YouTube."
Pool refuted these claims, stating that he had no association with the Heritage Foundation or their Project 2025. He also emphasized his opposition to capital punishment and clarified that the video was removed due to the potential misinterpretation of a guest's comments as advocating violence.
"The lies propagated by the Kamala campaign have reached an alarming level, striking at the conscience of any rational American," Pool declared.
The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, stated that "The Harris Campaign did not hedge this statement or couch it as opinion. To the contrary, to any reasonable reader, the Harris Campaign was saying that Mr. Pool wants to suspend the Constitution, make President Trump dictator, and use state power to imprison and kill Mr. Pool and President Trumps political opponents."
The lawsuit further alleged that the Harris campaign's publication was a lie and emphasized that Pool "has never advocated for the lawless, extrajudicial killing of his (or anyone elses) political opponents, to include in the video clip the Harris Campaign incorporated into its social media post."
The lawsuit also claimed that Pool had suffered "reputational harm" that would require millions of dollars to rectify. This harm was alleged to have affected viewers and potential guests, who were now less likely to appear on Mr. Pool's shows.
The lawsuit's resolution, marked by the deletion of the offending post, does not erase the fact that the accusations were made. However, it does demonstrate that the campaign had to concede their error, acknowledge their false claims, and substantiate this by removing the contentious content.
Pool has faced not only the ire of Kamala Harris' campaign but also a recent hit piece from The New York Times, which also targeted other influential figures such as Tucker Carlson, Ben Shapiro, The Babylon Bee, Benny Johnson, Charlie Kirk, who are either heterodox or conservative.
Despite the lack of detailed information about the conclusion of the lawsuit between Pool and Kamala Harris' campaign, the victory, coupled with YouTube's support for its high-earning contrarian creators, suggests a slight correction in the far-left's monopoly on the marketplace of ideas.
Login